Rough Guides Travel Talk
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Traveler |
please support this request of
Dr. Daphne Sheldrick Dear all, This is a little out of the ordinary, but we ask all of those that support The David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust through the fostering program to consider helping us save Amboseli, as a result of this new dramatic move by the Governement to degazette Amboseli National Park. Click on www.saveamboseli.net to support the cause. Please also help further by forwarding this website address to your colleagues and friends for mass action. Thank you. Dr. Daphne Sheldrick Park Move Illegal, Says Society The Nation (Nairobi) October 4, 2005 The move to degazette the Amboseli National Park was illegal, said a conservation group yesterday. By degazetting the park, the Government had contravened the Wildlife (Conservation and Management) Act, said the East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS). The move to degazette the national park also overlooked the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) which is responsible for the management and conservation of wildlife in the country. The Government's move is likely to affect donor funding for the wildlife policy, being undertaken by the United States Agency for International Development (USaid) and the infrastructure and park development by the European Union, both projects under the KWS. One of the leading international bodies on wildlife conservation, the World Conservation Union (IUCN) said it was studying the situation before it states its position. The wildlife society said the degazettement was contrary to Section 7 of the Wildlife Act, which states that the minister must consult with a competent authority before changing the status of any national park, national reserve, local sanctuary or even a part of it. The order to degazette such an area must also get approval from Parliament and a notice of 60 days must be published in the Kenya Gazette and in at least one newspaper in the country. Last Thursday, President Kibaki directed the Tourism minister to issue a legal notice to ensure that Amboseli is returned to the Maasai community as trust land. On the same day, minister Morris Dzoro issued a special gazette notice making the national park a national reserve to be run by Olkejuado county council. But the notice did not stick to the Wildlife Act. The Government broke the law, said EAWLS chairman Imre Loefler in a statement, and added that it was not surprising that the action was taken without any consultation of the many organisations that have being involved in the history of Amboseli - one of the best known game parks in the world."The East African WildLife Society regards the degazettement as illegal and detrimental to Amboseli as well as prejudicial to conservation policy," said the society. The EAWLS said it supported the concept that local communities should benefit from parks but was doubtful that the latest move would benefit those around Amboseli. "The Amboseli has been the responsibility of Kajiado county council before and was made into a national park precisely because of poor management, encroachment, environmental degradation, non-compliance with national and international conservation policies and interminable wrangling," said the society. The EAWLS said it had persistently criticised the manner in which income from game parks is distributed. "Handing over the park, however dramatic the gesture may be and whatever political constellation may have motivated it, is reckless, for the Kajiado county council has neither the capacity nor the experience to manage Amboseli," said Dr Loefler. The society said it was concerned about the domino effect that the ill conceived and illegal action may trigger. Last weekend, a lobby from Coast Province laid claim to seven national parks in the area, demanding that they be handed over to the communities through the local authorities. The KWS declined to comment on the impact of the move by the Government but conservationists, including former director David Western termed the decision negative. They said the Amboseli ecosystem was delicate and needed proper scientific management compared to that of the Masai Mara. Conservationists warned that donors are likely to withhold funding until after the November 21 referendum on the proposed new Constitution to see the direction wildlife management will take. Putting parks under local communities had not been successful, they said and cited the Masai Mara as an example where money collected never reached the community. The elephant research programme at Amboseli is one of the few projects that have survived with little disturbance in natural conditions. Each elephant has a tag and is closely monitored. Most Sincerely, Dr. Daphne Sheldrick M.B.E. http://www.sheldrickwildlifetrust.org |
||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

